You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This describes a method for using msprime to simulate tandem duplications in a recombining population, by treating each class of counts (1, 2, 3, 4, etc duplicated "genes") as a separate subpopulation (and not allowing mutations within each "gene")
I think we could create both a forward and a simulation that does this and saves the result as a GIG. Then we can test the results from both sorts of simulation against the expectations from Moritz's msprime simulations. He's happy for us to do this, and might be interested in the GIG concept we've started to build.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That is very helpful! When I did the literature review, I struggled to find examples of coalescent simulation tools that could simulate any structural variation except for inversions. Given all the technical challenges of simulating duplications, it will be great to have something to check our results against.
At PopGroup57, I chatted for a while to Moritz Otto from Univ of Cologne (Köln), who recently published this paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2023.08.001
This describes a method for using msprime to simulate tandem duplications in a recombining population, by treating each class of counts (1, 2, 3, 4, etc duplicated "genes") as a separate subpopulation (and not allowing mutations within each "gene")
I think we could create both a forward and a simulation that does this and saves the result as a GIG. Then we can test the results from both sorts of simulation against the expectations from Moritz's msprime simulations. He's happy for us to do this, and might be interested in the GIG concept we've started to build.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: