You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the current implementation of the package, is it possible to consider that the transition hazard in a iCTSTMs under the "clock reset" time scale depends also on the time at which the subject entered the state?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The general solution is to allow for covariates that dynamically update during the individual-level simulation. You would ideally want users to be able to write custom functions to update the covariates; however, thats would require some refactoring because the simulation is written in C++ at the moment and passing an R function to each iteration of a C++ for loop is highly inefficient.
@mclements how were you envisioning the two time scales would work?
Hello,
According to the current implementation of the package, is it possible to consider that the transition hazard in a iCTSTMs under the "clock reset" time scale depends also on the time at which the subject entered the state?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: