Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Helix overrides Kitty Terminal's cursor_trail configuration #12642

Closed
genskyff opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

Helix overrides Kitty Terminal's cursor_trail configuration #12642

genskyff opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
C-enhancement Category: Improvements

Comments

@genskyff
Copy link

I'm using Helix on macOS through the Kitty terminal emulator with the cursor_trail feature enabled. My kitty.conf is configured as follows:

cursor_trail 10
cursor_trail_decay 0.1 0.3

This configuration allows the cursor to have a trail effect similar to that of Neovide.

When I use Neovim within Kitty, the cursor trail effect works as expected because Neovim does not override Kitty's cursor settings.

However, when I use Helix, the cursor trail effect does not take effect. It appears that Helix's internal mechanisms override Kitty's cursor configurations.

Expected Behavior

Helix should respect the terminal emulator's cursor settings, allowing the cursor trail effect to function as configured.

Possible Solutions

Is there a way to prevent Helix from overriding the terminal emulator's cursor effects, or can this be configured through existing settings? If not, could this feature be added in a future update?

Environment

Operating System: macOS 14.7.2
Terminal Emulator: Kitty 0.39.0
Helix Version: 25.01.1 (e7ac2fc)

@genskyff genskyff added the C-enhancement Category: Improvements label Jan 23, 2025
@pascalkuthe
Copy link
Member

this is not possible, we always overwrite the terimnals cursor because we support multiple cursor and the terminal only supports a single cursor

@pascalkuthe pascalkuthe closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-enhancement Category: Improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants