Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rpb lookuptables #61

Open
TobiasNx opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Update rpb lookuptables #61

TobiasNx opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor

TobiasNx commented Dec 10, 2024

          > Also there are 26 records that have are not part of the NZ but are in the rpb collection.

https://lobid.org/resources/search?q=inCollection.id%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Flobid.org%2Fresources%2FHT013494180%23%21%22+AND+NOT+inCollection.id%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Flobid.org%2Forganisations%2FDE-655%23%21%22

These seems mainly to be wrong mappings assigning records to CZ Consor Records instead of ZDB/NZ Records (21 instances). These can easily be fixed:

---
almaMmsId: "99370691768806441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01024538" -> HT015612364 -> 990170549260206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370695565206441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01074757" ->  HT017735962 -> 990197983170206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370695975906441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01041072" -> HT016926066 -> 990188172110206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370696004506441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01040576" -> HT017379813 -> 990192906610206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370685222206441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01076749" -> HT019971887 -> 990227800790206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686223506441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01024509" -> HT015817615 -> 990173331820206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686223106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01034047" -> HT016225491 -> 990178421190206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370688114906441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01034103" -> HT016306054 -> 990179419420206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370698952906441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "107t081447" -> HT015495978 -> 990165399670206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686737106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01024554" -> HT015817675 -> 990173332420206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370688948206441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01076258" -> HT019149553 -> 990214114060206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370683064406441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01024500" -> HT015941280 -> 990174711090206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370683584806441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01044786" -> HT016965533 -> 990188584160206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370685807106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01076681" -> HT014169524 -> 990133002700206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370685802706441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01038384" -> HT016490325 -> 990181886860206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370696006406441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01040707" -> HT017446139 -> 990193588700206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370688470706441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "036t051384" -> HT016046758 -> 990176510200206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370697499206441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01044794" -> HT017427689 -> 990193391480206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686789106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01038436" -> HT016388625 -> 990180824070206441

---
almaMmsId: "99370686790306441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01038805" -> HT016515187 -> 990182143410206441


---
almaMmsId: "99370690340106441" (CZ Titel statt NZ ZDB)
rpbId: "929t01045608" -> HT017692163 -> 990197311930206441

But 5 mappings seem unclear to me, probably need help by @acka47 or @fsteeg or RPB to identify the correct lobid record:

---
almaMmsId: "99370777663406441"
rpbId: "929t993448"  -> ist das die elektronische version? kann man elektronische Versionen in der RPB erkennen? Ich vermute, dass es die Printausgabe ist,
unter der almaMmsId is ein Consor CZ Titel.


---
almaMmsId: "99370693599306441"
rpbId: "036t980990" -> ist das die elektronische version? kann man elektronische Versionen in der RPB erkennen? Ich vermute, dass es die Printausgabe ist,
unter der almaMmsId is ein Consor CZ Titel.


---
almaMmsId: "990019846300106470"  -> Das schein ein lokaler Titel zu sein. Dürfte nicht zur RPB gehören.
hbzId: "HT017502667"

---
almaMmsId: "990000167930306443"  -> Das schein ein lokaler Titel zu sein. Dürfte nicht zur RPB gehören.
rpbId: "929t062907" -> HT006908366 -> 990054811920206441 (evtl dieser als Ersatz)


---
almaMmsId: "990027794510206443"  -> Das schein ein lokaler Titel zu sein. Dürfte nicht zur RPB gehören.
hbzId: "HT017502667" 

Originally posted by @TobiasNx in hbz/lobid-resources#2107 (comment)

TobiasNx added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2024
When reconciling the target was not narrowed down to the NZ collection. I changed all identifiable CZ records to their NZ counterparts.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant