We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Two things:
There already exists something like this in skohub-docker-vocabs, see https://github.com/skohub-io/skohub-docker-vocabs/blob/acba19dd66bd9cc155be74df10f6951f6d812ff5/.github/workflows/main.yml#L40-L58. We should definitely use the same Shacl shape from https://github.com/skohub-io/shapes.
@fsteeg Is this something you could do?
Note that there is one file in this repo that does not contain a SKOS vocab: lobid-vocab.ttl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This was resolved by @maipet in #222. Closing
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Two things:
There already exists something like this in skohub-docker-vocabs, see https://github.com/skohub-io/skohub-docker-vocabs/blob/acba19dd66bd9cc155be74df10f6951f6d812ff5/.github/workflows/main.yml#L40-L58. We should definitely use the same Shacl shape from https://github.com/skohub-io/shapes.
@fsteeg Is this something you could do?
Note that there is one file in this repo that does not contain a SKOS vocab: lobid-vocab.ttl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: