We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, Nix Type inference is a completely separate type subsystem from language semantics:
On: (2021-05-31)
Notice there are Expr.Types that are language basis & Type.Type that is an inference basis.
Expr.Types
Type.Type
They are completely separate currently. It is redunculous that Type.Type does not have ANY import from HNix.
They (Expr.* -> Types.*) need to share the maximum types. It would lead to #187 almost directly.
A good start is variable names.
In the type system, variable names are variable names.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also Lint type system seems strongly related to Type.Type inference.
Lint
Sorry, something went wrong.
#294 is a first stage.
See: johnchildren@7065a91
No branches or pull requests
Currently, Nix Type inference is a completely separate type subsystem from language semantics:
On: (2021-05-31)
Notice there are
Expr.Types
that are language basis &Type.Type
that is an inference basis.They are completely separate currently. It is redunculous that
Type.Type
does not have ANY import from HNix.They (Expr.* -> Types.*) need to share the maximum types. It would lead to #187 almost directly.
A good start is variable names.
In the type system, variable names are variable names.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: