Skip to content

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Nov 19, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
rust patch 2025-11-03 -> 2025-11-18

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 11am" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge November 19, 2025 13:50
@hash-worker hash-worker bot requested a review from a team November 19, 2025 13:50
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs > error-stack Affects the `error-stack` crate (library) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) labels Nov 19, 2025
@deepsource-io
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 6f35d2f..a40ff4d. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource SQL LogoSQL✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage⚠️ Artifact not reportedTimed out: Artifact was never reportedView Check ↗
DeepSource Rust LogoRust✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Shell LogoShell✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Docker LogoDocker✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann previously approved these changes Nov 19, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.87%. Comparing base (12b72c1) to head (3e697cd).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8042      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.85%   55.87%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1142     1142              
  Lines      105678   105296     -382     
  Branches     4826     4826              
==========================================
- Hits        59024    58838     -186     
+ Misses      45959    45763     -196     
  Partials      695      695              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.88% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (+0.47%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-net 96.18% <ø> (+0.09%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-tower 66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (+1.51%) ⬆️
rust.hash-graph-api 2.89% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.53% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 25.67% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
rust.hash-graph-store 30.59% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (+0.26%) ⬆️
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.45% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️
rust.hashql-ast 87.24% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️
rust.hashql-compiletest 49.36% <ø> (+0.40%) ⬆️
rust.hashql-core 81.18% <ø> (+0.17%) ⬆️
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.43% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️
rust.hashql-eval 68.54% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
rust.hashql-hir 89.10% <ø> (+0.18%) ⬆️
rust.hashql-mir 54.41% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.00% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/rust-toolchains branch from a40ff4d to 1b90a38 Compare November 20, 2025 09:15
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 20, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Updated (UTC)
petrinaut Error Error Nov 21, 2025 1:00pm

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team label Nov 20, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot dismissed TimDiekmann’s stale review November 20, 2025 11:31

Your organization requires reapproval when changes are made, so Graphite has dismissed approvals. See the output of git range-diff at https://github.com/hashintel/hash/actions/runs/19535405854

Copy link
Member

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@indietyp indietyp changed the title Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2025-11-17 Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2025-11-18 Nov 20, 2025
@indietyp
Copy link
Member

Updating to 2025-11-18 instead of 2025-11-17, due to rust-lang/miri#4711

@indietyp indietyp requested a review from TimDiekmann November 20, 2025 11:32
TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann previously approved these changes Nov 20, 2025
Copy link
Member

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TimDiekmann approved this PR from Slack with Graphite

@github-actions github-actions bot dismissed TimDiekmann’s stale review November 20, 2025 11:34

Your organization requires reapproval when changes are made, so Graphite has dismissed approvals. See the output of git range-diff at https://github.com/hashintel/hash/actions/runs/19535488566

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash-worker bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 606e150 Nov 21, 2025
166 of 167 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/rs/rust-toolchains branch November 21, 2025 13:51
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-42.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$23.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-45.034 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-84.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$12.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-64.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$4.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.89 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.73 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$2.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.94 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.43 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.569 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$83.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$38.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.896 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$482 \mathrm{ms} \pm 644 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$97.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$89.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$286 \mathrm{ms} \pm 539 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.569 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$18.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$22.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.263 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.746 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$59.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$65.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$73.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$80.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$87.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$54.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$80.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.333 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$61.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$69.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$71.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$70.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 482 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$40.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-57.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$543 \mathrm{ms} \pm 890 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) area/libs > error-stack Affects the `error-stack` crate (library) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) area/tests New or updated tests type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants