Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: differentiate concealed dropouts in ld-analyse #767

Open
putnam opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Feature request: differentiate concealed dropouts in ld-analyse #767

putnam opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement ld-decode-tools An issue only affecting the ld-decode-tools

Comments

@putnam
Copy link

putnam commented Jul 29, 2022

When viewing frames in ld-analyse, dropouts can already be visually indicated. But if you run the dropout corrector, the dropouts still appear in ld-analyse (and in the "visible dropout" graph), even though they may have been concealed.

It would be cool to see perhaps another color to indicate a concealed dropout, and/or a way to see the visual dropout graph with and without concealments applied. It might help understand how well-concealed dropouts are on a given source. At the moment all we know is the number of concealments as text output on ld-dropout-correct; I'd love to see those concealments visually represented in ld-analyse in some way.

@simoninns simoninns added enhancement ld-decode-tools An issue only affecting the ld-decode-tools labels Jul 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement ld-decode-tools An issue only affecting the ld-decode-tools
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants