You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When viewing frames in ld-analyse, dropouts can already be visually indicated. But if you run the dropout corrector, the dropouts still appear in ld-analyse (and in the "visible dropout" graph), even though they may have been concealed.
It would be cool to see perhaps another color to indicate a concealed dropout, and/or a way to see the visual dropout graph with and without concealments applied. It might help understand how well-concealed dropouts are on a given source. At the moment all we know is the number of concealments as text output on ld-dropout-correct; I'd love to see those concealments visually represented in ld-analyse in some way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When viewing frames in ld-analyse, dropouts can already be visually indicated. But if you run the dropout corrector, the dropouts still appear in ld-analyse (and in the "visible dropout" graph), even though they may have been concealed.
It would be cool to see perhaps another color to indicate a concealed dropout, and/or a way to see the visual dropout graph with and without concealments applied. It might help understand how well-concealed dropouts are on a given source. At the moment all we know is the number of concealments as text output on ld-dropout-correct; I'd love to see those concealments visually represented in ld-analyse in some way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: