-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wait for clearURLs rewrite/how to address clearURLs' shortcoming? #1
Comments
An alternative method I'm thinking of is only using clearURLs for websites that won't automatically redirect you to the destination (e.g. youtube links, skimlinks, etc) - i.e. rawRules. For "stripping" everything else, I think relying on existing UBO rulesets like https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets and https://github.com/AdguardTeam/FiltersRegistry/blob/master/filters/filter_17_TrackParam/filter.txt might be better? Obviously UBO blocklists are 1. fucking huge and 2. do a LOT more than just "strip trackers from URLs", but preprocessing these lists by stripping off DOM-manipulating filters (or basically anything that doesn't touch the URL) and focusing on ones that are usually named "privacy" something should help. In that case, I would need:
The motivation for skipping clearURLs for the actual tracker stripping is the existing clearURLs-based approach falls flat on obscure/chinese sites that don't provide any sort of "hints":
|
Resources for directly integrating UBO to strip bullshit from URLs:
Also I have been made aware that even the annoyances rulesets contain tracker stripping magic? https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/blob/02d16a221c276fe58bdd72cc947b26eaf9d1318e/filters/annoyances.txt#L4560-L4561 |
Some of the rule semantics might change... or we might have to abandon tracker stripping entirely
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: