You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm interested in generalizing the functionality provided by compute.mooring_volume_transport. I want to also compute property transports, like heat transport or salt transport etc.
Ideally, I want this function to work using a mooringpath to minimize interpolation errors. E.g., I want to compute the boundary heat fluxes across a control volume in the ECCO dataset by integrating the ADV{x,y,r}_TH fields. For other datasets (like LLC_4320) there would need to be an interpolation step to compute Temp on the mooring path.
I don't think this functionality exists in OceanSpy currently, right?
If not, adapting compute.mooring_volume_transport seems like a good option. We'd just need to pass an extra argument defining the intensive property to integrate. If necessary, there would be an interpolation step. Then the computation would be modified by multiplying with the property value.
Is this a good idea?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My understanding is that only volume transport is implemented, but like you said, it would be somewhat straightforward from there. Add a property value (temp, salt, perhaps momentum or even pv) plus a reference value.
I'm interested in generalizing the functionality provided by
compute.mooring_volume_transport
. I want to also compute property transports, like heat transport or salt transport etc.Ideally, I want this function to work using a
mooring
path
to minimize interpolation errors. E.g., I want to compute the boundary heat fluxes across a control volume in theECCO
dataset by integrating theADV{x,y,r}_TH
fields. For other datasets (likeLLC_4320
) there would need to be an interpolation step to computeTemp
on the mooring path.I don't think this functionality exists in
OceanSpy
currently, right?If not, adapting
compute.mooring_volume_transport
seems like a good option. We'd just need to pass an extra argument defining the intensive property to integrate. If necessary, there would be an interpolation step. Then the computation would be modified by multiplying with the property value.Is this a good idea?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: