Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Working with other knowledge bases such as conceptnet #24

Open
ManasiPat opened this issue Mar 18, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Working with other knowledge bases such as conceptnet #24

ManasiPat opened this issue Mar 18, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@ManasiPat
Copy link

Can the tool be used to get semantic similarity between the entities of other knowledge bases such as conceptnet.

@dhimmel
Copy link
Contributor

dhimmel commented Oct 23, 2020

I am also interested in whether the graph-based information content similarity metrics can be applied to other networks than
DBpedia.

For example, I'd like to compute Resnik or Lin similarities on the Experimental Factor Ontology. Is this library general purpose or specialized just for work for DBpedia?

CC @hopple

@balkian
Copy link
Member

balkian commented Oct 26, 2020

Thank you for your interest in sematch.

Since the original author is not working at GSI anymore, allow me to answer your question to the best of my ability.

For the most part, sematch was conceived as a general purpose tool. There are some parts that seem to be very specific to DBpedia (e.g., the NameSPARQL class), but most of them could be used with any other SPARQL endpoints / RDF graphs despite their name.

I'm not really familiar with the Experimental Factor Ontology, but my guess is that you could create an ad-hoc DataTransform, or reuse the existing DBpediaDataTransform pointing it to EFO's .owl file. That should be enough to calculate concept similarity. You can check the documentation and the test_similarity.py.

We will be doing maintenance work on sematch, and we might include other data sources if the community shows enough interest.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants