You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all: I realy like this project. Thx @szkiba
I am experimenting with it, and try to combine with xk6-g0 to write load test in go. It would be really useful, if I could overwrite an automatically discovered extension (e.g.: when I try to modify something on xk6-g0) or if I could include an officially not supported (not in the k6 extension registry) extension.
Due to lack of this option, I had to fallback to xk6.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
szkiba
changed the title
[Feature] Capability to include extension from source on the local machine
Capability to include extension from source on the local machine
Sep 29, 2023
Hi @bandorko , Thanks for the feedback and the feature suggestion.
The primary users of k6x are k6 users. Building from local sources is basically k6 extension developer support, so it is outside the scope of k6x.
Support for unregistered extensions (for example, extensions intended for internal use) is not a top priority, but it is possible that it will be added to the roadmap. (Actually, I already implemented it once, but deleted it because it was a bit confusing)
First of all: I realy like this project. Thx @szkiba
I am experimenting with it, and try to combine with xk6-g0 to write load test in go. It would be really useful, if I could overwrite an automatically discovered extension (e.g.: when I try to modify something on xk6-g0) or if I could include an officially not supported (not in the k6 extension registry) extension.
Due to lack of this option, I had to fallback to xk6.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: