Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] A more flexible carryover effect #385

Open
LukaData opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature Request] A more flexible carryover effect #385

LukaData opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@LukaData
Copy link
Collaborator

LukaData commented Dec 6, 2024

From our experience, especially, when dealing with larger purchases there tends to be a longer time to convert period, between a marketing spend and the revenue stream. Decisions like buying a car, vacation, appliances, etc. take time. Marketing channels may have the highest impact on the consumer days or weeks after their initial touchpoint.

Similarly many campaigns advertise promotions, discounts, renewals... that will happen in the future. Marketing channel investments for Black Friday start weeks ahead of the actual deals and revenue streams.

Proposed solution: Provide a more flexible approach to the carryover effect such as a delayed adstock function* along with the existing geometric decay.

*Bayesian Methods for Media Mix Modeling with Carryover and Shape Effects 2.1

@alexwakim
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your feedback! We'll take your suggestion into consideration.

In the meantime, you might try adjusting the max_lag argument in ModelSpec to change the maximum number of future time periods affected. You could also try using custom alpha_m priors to encourage longer-term effects; an alpha_m prior with more mass closer to 1 will encourage this.

@yeonjaepark yeonjaepark added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants