-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use react-redux in place of redux/react #6
Comments
With high probability there will be no flux framework at all in next example versions. Right now I write another examples showing how to use map with Large GeoJSON databases (vector tiles, svg drawing), and just use recompose library. |
That sounds wonderful! It would make this project even closer to idiomatic react. By when do you anticipate updating the examples? |
You are like my boss, he asks me same questions everyday :-) |
Thank you for the update! I will keep checking back often looking for additional developments. Keep up the good work :) |
Hi, I am just wondering why the move away from Flux? |
It's not a good idea to externalize all the state. Also all that fine tools like So I use and love redux but for small part of state. And I think that in examples there is no need to place additional flux code at all. |
Hi istarkov,
Thank you for the amazing work on google-map-react. It has been a great help and learning experience going through the source code of the same. I noticed that the version of redux used is 0.11.1 in the examples, do you plan on updating the examples to use react-redux v4.0.0 since react bindings for redux officially moved to react-redux after v1.0.0-rc (https://github.com/rackt/redux/releases)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: