You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have downloaded ERA5 data following instructions on ECMWF. To check the accuracy of data, I downloaded data on 2022-01-01, just the same as the example data provided in Google Cloud Bucket, but actually they were slightly different. Would I ask which API should be used to download these data, or could you publish a script or instructions for constructing input data?
Thanks a lot !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am not sure, but maybe this could explain it: ERA5 is on 0.25 degree resolution while the final model is run using data from the ECMWF high resolution model that has a 0.1 degree resolution and is then downsampled to 0.25 degrees before being used as input. Maybe this explains the difference?
Same issue. I tried the same process on 2022-01-01 to generate the other dataset but got a slightly different dataset especially the polar region's total_precipitation_6hr. I guess other variables are directly downloaded from ECMWF and no need to pre-process so the difference would be just a noise but the pattern on the figure of the difference btw mine and google bucket's total_precipitation_6hr doesn't seem like a noise. I really appreciate it if you share how to solve this issue
I have downloaded ERA5 data following instructions on ECMWF. To check the accuracy of data, I downloaded data on 2022-01-01, just the same as the example data provided in Google Cloud Bucket, but actually they were slightly different. Would I ask which API should be used to download these data, or could you publish a script or instructions for constructing input data?
Thanks a lot !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: