You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you very much for providing excellent datasets in Learning to Simulate.
However, I have some questions regarding the variables in the metadata. Why is the value of sequence_length smaller by 1 compared to the actual dimension of the variables in the data? For example, in the waterramps dataset, the sequence_length is 600, while position.shape[1] is 601.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you very much for providing excellent datasets in Learning to Simulate. However, I have some questions regarding the variables in the metadata. Why is the value of sequence_length smaller by 1 compared to the actual dimension of the variables in the data? For example, in the waterramps dataset, the sequence_length is 600, while position.shape[1] is 601.
Excuse me, can you share the datasets?
Thank you very much for providing excellent datasets in Learning to Simulate.
However, I have some questions regarding the variables in the metadata. Why is the value of
sequence_length
smaller by 1 compared to the actual dimension of the variables in the data? For example, in the waterramps dataset, thesequence_length
is 600, whileposition.shape[1]
is 601.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: