We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bear with me if I have misunderstood usage.
I feel like a common usage is having images that look like this: ![](image.png) which references current directory.
![](image.png)
Now if I want to prefix that in html, so that it points to /public/ or something, my solution was to use
RendererOptions{ ... AbsolutePrefix: "/public/", }
Which does not seem to work.
Digging a little bit shows that isRelativeLink()-function says that it's not relative Isn't it though? 🙂
isRelativeLink()
AFAICT, it's proper syntax for relative urls, and quite commonly used.
Would you be open for a pull request, adding some more heuristics to isRelativeLink()?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seems like I can probably solve this with a custom RenderNodeHook otherwise?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Bear with me if I have misunderstood usage.
I feel like a common usage is having images that look like this:
![](image.png)
which references current directory.
Now if I want to prefix that in html, so that it points to /public/ or something, my solution was to use
Which does not seem to work.
Digging a little bit shows that
isRelativeLink()
-function says that it's not relativeIsn't it though? 🙂
AFAICT, it's proper syntax for relative urls, and quite commonly used.
Would you be open for a pull request, adding some more heuristics to
isRelativeLink()
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: