Skip to content

Schema validation seems to ignore formats #474

@tschmidtb51

Description

@tschmidtb51

It looks like the current version (3.0.0-beta1; but it might have existed in previous version), does not evaluated the format constrains. This was discovered when checking https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/971b6976d1ce52a710025aef920dba72d3a0675e/csaf_files/OT/white/2023/icsa-23-159-02.json#L269 resulted in a different amount of errors while using the csaf_validator with the csaf_validator-service preset of mandatory (0) vs basic (1).

We need to find out, why the uri wasn't checked for the format.

Metadata

Metadata

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions