You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's been agreed so far that a list of materials should be kept separately with materials absorption coefficients, something along these lines:
# id name alpha description
0 metal 0.56 0.11 0.35 0.15 0.48 1.0 1.0 0.83 Some description about this material
1 wood 0.26 0.44 0.75 0.08 0.38 0.34 0.0 0.18 And so on
2 polymer 0.0 0.12 0.07 0.0 0.45 0.82 0.3 0.22 And so forth
3 ceramic 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.19 0.14 Ceramic material from Uranus
4 cloth 0.36 0.77 0.44 0.21 0.37 0.6 0.71 1.0 Cloth
Question: should this data base maintain the list of scattering coefficients as well? What are the implications/advantages/disadvantages of keeping it outside/inside the same file?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's been agreed so far that a list of materials should be kept separately with materials absorption coefficients, something along these lines:
Question: should this data base maintain the list of scattering coefficients as well? What are the implications/advantages/disadvantages of keeping it outside/inside the same file?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: