Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linking opportunity #55

Open
seltmann opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Linking opportunity #55

seltmann opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@seltmann
Copy link
Member

@jhpoelen In continuation of a recent conversation about improving data publication text and formatting, I wanted to demo a new trend in Symbiota portal management. People are starting to publish portal contents (backup DwC-A files) to Zenodo and add the badge to portal metadata. I did this with the products of a recent review publication of UCSB-IZC. See https://ecdysis.org/collections/misc/collprofiles.php?collid=38

How can we make the output report from elton/preston more human readable? Can we also include the archived DwC-A files without modification and make it clear where those live? Thanks!

Screen Shot 2023-08-24 at 9 42 21 AM

@jhpoelen
Copy link
Member

@seltmann good to hear that folks are using available data publication platforms like https://zenodo.org to help keep copies around.

How can we make the output report from elton/preston more human readable?

Thanks for asking! I've been experimenting using pandoc to generate review reports like:
https://depot.globalbioticinteractions.org/reviews/globalbioticinteractions/ucsb-izc/
see also https://depot.globalbioticinteractions.org/reviews/globalbioticinteractions/ucsb-izc/index.docx .

see attached screenshot below.

Can we also include the archived DwC-A files without modification and make it clear where those live?

Yes, we can include the archived DwC-A files. I you can propose a text paragraph you'd like to see in the review report, and a proposed citation and hints on where to get the archive, I can try and add this to the review report.

Note that the review report in embedded in some GloBI review workflow, but I can imagine that modifications of these workflows can be applied to non-GloBI stuff also.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants