🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - December 26, 2025 #7692
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 3 days ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Audit Summary
📊 Trend Analysis
Workflow Health Trends
Analysis: Success rate has been fluctuating around 45-65% over the past 2 days. December 25 saw 20 successful runs and 11 failures (64.5%), while December 26 had 24 successes and 13 failures (64.9%). The consistency suggests systemic issues rather than random failures.
Token Usage & Cost Trends
Analysis: Average daily token usage is 8.9M tokens at an average daily cost of $2.90. The 7-day moving average shows stable token consumption patterns. Total cost over the analysis period: $5.79.
🚨 Critical Issues
1. MCP Server Initialization Errors (High Priority)
Issue: MCP clients failing to start with "Invalid URL" and missing module errors.
Impact: These errors prevent MCP servers (safeinputs, safeoutputs) from initializing properly, causing workflow failures.
Root Cause: Recent changes to MCP HTTP transport configuration may have introduced bugs (see commit 2dd6edb).
2. MCP Server Failures
Impact: The safeoutputs MCP server is consistently failing in Smoke Claude workflows, preventing proper output handling.
3. Permission Denied Warnings (Medium Priority)
Issue: 90 instances of "Permission denied and could not request permission from user" warnings.
Affected Workflows (10 workflows):
Impact: Workflows cannot perform certain operations due to permission restrictions in the sandbox environment.
🔧 Missing Tools
Recommendation: These are legitimate tool requests. Consider:
Safe-outputs File Not Found (76 occurrences)
Squid Proxy Warnings (53 occurrences)
Core is Not Defined (18 occurrences)
📈 Performance Metrics
Affected Workflows
Top workflows with issues:
📋 Recommendations
Immediate Actions
Fix MCP HTTP Transport Issues ⚡
mcp_http_transport.cjsandsafe_inputs_mcp_server_http.cjs./read_buffer.cjsmodule issueAddress safeoutputs MCP Failures ⚡
Review Sandbox Permissions 🔒
Short-term Improvements
Add Missing Tools 🛠️
Fix JavaScript Runtime Errors 🐛
Long-term Monitoring
Track Success Rate Trends 📊
Optimize Token Usage 💰
Historical Context
This is the first comprehensive audit using the gh-aw MCP server analysis tools. Key findings have been stored in
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/audits/2025-12-26.jsonfor future trend analysis.Baseline metrics established:
Next Steps
Audit completed: 2025-12-26T04:07:00Z
Data source: 68 workflow runs from /tmp/gh-aw/aw-mcp/logs
Analysis tools: gh-aw MCP server, Python pandas/matplotlib
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions