[Daily Auto-labelling Summary] Auto-labelling Summary – 2026-04-10

[mnkiefer]

Summary

• Discussions reviewed: 80
• Label changes applied: 8
• Discussions skipped (unsafe existing labels): 17 — these had lowercase bug, question, or other labels that are not in the allowed-label list; updating them would risk inadvertently removing those labels.

Changes Applied

Discussion #	Title (truncated)	Labels Added	Reason
#215	how do i attacth proof.	Verification Help & Guidance	Body template clearly indicates Feature/Topic Area: Verification Help & Guidance; label was missing
#189	Issue Accessing Copilot Student Benefits (Opus 4.6 and PRO Models)	Verification Help & Guidance	Body template clearly indicates Feature/Topic Area: Verification Help & Guidance; label was missing
#175	Application for Student Developer Pack stuck on "Pending" for 2 weeks	Verification Help & Guidance	Body template clearly indicates Feature/Topic Area: Verification Help & Guidance; label was missing
#214	Bring back Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6	Product Feedback	Non-template submission clearly requesting a product change (model availability for Student Pack); no type label present
#177	Copilot button	Product Feedback, Copilot	Body requests a setting to disable the Copilot button — clear product feedback about the Copilot feature on mobile; both labels were missing
#152	Application for Student Developer Pack stuck on "Pending" for 12 days	Benefit Activation/Waiting	Title explicitly states application has been pending for 12 days — canonical signal for this label
#195	Unable to update billing information due to trade control restriction	Billing & Payment Issues	Discussion is explicitly about a billing/payment blocker; label was absent
#151	Unable to contact support + Copilot billing issue ($14.89 charged by mistake)	Billing & Payment Issues	Discussion is explicitly about an erroneous Copilot billing charge; label was absent

Notes

• 17 discussions were not updated because their existing labels (bug, question, other — all lowercase GitHub defaults) are outside the workflow's allowed-label list. Modifying those discussions would have silently dropped those labels. The reason-for-posting-labeler should handle Bug/Question for new discussions going forward.
• No discussions in this batch had inactive_signal.eligible = true.
• No discussions had label_hints.welcome_candidate = true.

Generated by Label Discussions · ● 944.2K · ◷

• expires on Apr 17, 2026, 9:38 AM UTC

[github-actions]

This issue is being closed as outdated. A newer issue has been created: #138

View newer issue

---

This action was performed automatically by the Label Discussions workflow.