Persona Overview
- Agent: agentic-workflows custom agent
- Personas This Run: Program Manager, Designer, Legal / Compliance
- Scenarios Tested: 3
- Average Quality Score: 4.5/5.0
Key Findings
- The guidance strongly matches common workflow archetypes:
schedule for digests and pull_request for review gates.
- Safe-output usage is consistently framed correctly:
create-issue for recurring reports, add-comment for PR-local findings, and explicit noop guidance.
- Security posture is consistently strong: read-only agent jobs, minimal permissions, and GitHub reads via
gh-proxy.
- The weakest area is domain-specific depth: design-link validation and license-policy logic need more task-specific examples.
Top Patterns
- Most common triggers:
schedule/workflow_dispatch for reports and pull_request with paths: scoping for review tasks.
- Most recommended tools:
github in gh-proxy mode; optional playwright only for UI-focused scenarios.
- Security practices observed: read-only permissions, safe-outputs for writes, and explicit no-op behavior.
View High Quality Responses
- Program Manager digest: Best fit overall; reporting guidance already covers explicit windows, duplicate suppression, and issue-based publishing.
- Designer Figma-link check: Strong PR-scoped pattern with good
paths: filtering and correct preference for add-comment over issue creation.
View Areas for Improvement
- License scan depth: Good structural guidance, but SPDX allow/deny-list examples and escalation thresholds would improve consistency.
- Design reference validation: Existing linked-reference guidance is useful, but
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md could include a compact example for design-token/Figma enforcement.
- Batch-evaluation support: The local
agenticworkflows CLI exposed compile/audit-style tools but not a direct conversational evaluation command, limiting direct response capture in this run.
Recommendations
- Add a compact compliance example to
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md covering dependency-license review with pull_request.paths, add-comment, escalation rules, and noop criteria.
- Extend
.github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.md or .github/aw/workflow-patterns.md with a design-governance example for PRs touching tokens/CSS that require linked references.
- Add clearer guidance in
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md on scenario-specific decision rubrics (for example duplicate weekly report keys and PR-local vs cross-cutting escalation).
Generated by 🎭 Agent Persona Explorer · 22.6 AIC · ⌖ 19.5 AIC · ⊞ 6.5K · ◷
Persona Overview
Key Findings
schedulefor digests andpull_requestfor review gates.create-issuefor recurring reports,add-commentfor PR-local findings, and explicitnoopguidance.gh-proxy.Top Patterns
schedule/workflow_dispatchfor reports andpull_requestwithpaths:scoping for review tasks.githubingh-proxymode; optionalplaywrightonly for UI-focused scenarios.View High Quality Responses
paths:filtering and correct preference foradd-commentover issue creation.View Areas for Improvement
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.mdcould include a compact example for design-token/Figma enforcement.agenticworkflowsCLI exposed compile/audit-style tools but not a direct conversational evaluation command, limiting direct response capture in this run.Recommendations
.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.mdcovering dependency-license review withpull_request.paths,add-comment, escalation rules, andnoopcriteria..github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.mdor.github/aw/workflow-patterns.mdwith a design-governance example for PRs touching tokens/CSS that require linked references..github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.mdon scenario-specific decision rubrics (for example duplicate weekly report keys and PR-local vs cross-cutting escalation).