You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to have more flexibility with the dimensions of the forces defined.
The assembler assembles the surface force always like this
auto m_force = m_assembler.getCoeff(*m_forceFun, m_ori);
This means that m_forceFun should have the same domain dimension as the geometry map m_ori.
It would be nice to make this more flexible. For example, when we have a gsFunctionSet-derived class that computes the composition, we can register m_forceFun using this composition, and keep the rest of the code the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be nice to have more flexibility with the dimensions of the forces defined.
The assembler assembles the surface force always like this
auto m_force = m_assembler.getCoeff(*m_forceFun, m_ori);
This means that
m_forceFun
should have the same domain dimension as the geometry mapm_ori
.It would be nice to make this more flexible. For example, when we have a
gsFunctionSet
-derived class that computes the composition, we can registerm_forceFun
using this composition, and keep the rest of the code the same.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: