You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we're planning to release a few breaking changes that we want to push into v30. But if we want to backport something into the old releases, we need to make sure we have a clear way of doing so without accidentally pulling in breaking changes into old releases.
Ideas:
Support multiple branches per release so that we can easily backport features to them
Make changes in-code that ensure that a feature get enabled only for specific Kubernetes releases
What else (please explore other best practices)
Acceptance criteria:
Evaluate different options and document clearly their downsides / risks / benefit before making a decision
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yulianedyalkova
changed the title
Investigate how we deal with breaking changes in cluster chart
Investigate how we deal with breaking changes in cluster charts
Nov 26, 2024
I'm having a hard time deciding on the least bad but I think I also agree with option 2 - mainly because it minimally effect the current way of doing things and can be relatively easily reverted if we later come up with a better solution.
Currently we're planning to release a few breaking changes that we want to push into v30. But if we want to backport something into the old releases, we need to make sure we have a clear way of doing so without accidentally pulling in breaking changes into old releases.
Ideas:
Acceptance criteria:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: