-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Bad convergence of 1D Greens functions #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
On 07/25/2011 10:28 AM, TheJoris wrote:
|
Yes, see pdf document with all the green's functions. Op 25 jul. 2011 01:28 schreef "TheJoris" < Because for D t << L^2, the particle 'doesnt see' the absorbing boundary and Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: |
Issue Solved: The 1DAbsAbs::drawR function now checks if H*sqrt(2Dt) < (L - r0 - vt); or is it likely for the particle positioned at r0 with a drift v, to reach the right boundary at L in a time t. We use a cutoff H. If the particle is many (now set at H = 6) standard deviations away from both of the boundaries, it draws a new position from the free greens function. Things to do is:
|
Issue partly solved, see below.
1D Greens Functions converge badly when drawing a new center of mass (drawR) after a SINGLE_REACTION or a IV_REACTION with a large domain size L. Where L is large as in L^2/(D t) >> 1. Both these events can return very small dt's (for a small IV domain or large dissociation constant).
Because for D t << L^2, the particle "doesn't see" the absorbing boundary and we can use the free 1D greens function. So, just as with the 3D functions, we could use different greens functions for particles far away from the boundary(s).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: