feat(dynamodb-client): add word boundary in regex #251
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What did you implement:
Closes #242
How did you implement it:
Added word boundary
/binexprSegmentsHow can we verify it:
The following UpdateExpression:
"SET #assets = list_append(if_not_exists(#assets, :empty_list), :assets)"Throw
"Invalid UpdateExpression: Syntax error; token: \",\", near: \"#as, #LambdaPowertoolsContext\""This happens because
exprSegmentswithout word boundaries produces the following result:["SET", "#as", "set", "s = list_append(if_not_exists(#as", "set", "s, :empty_list), :as", "set", "s)"]Adding the word boundary produces the expected result:
["SET", "#assets = list_append(if_not_exists(#assets, :empty_list), :assets)"]Is this ready for review?: YES
Is it a breaking change?: NO