Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Search results are not correct #1285

Open
afbora opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Search results are not correct #1285

afbora opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
type: bug 🐛 Is a bug; fixes a bug

Comments

@afbora
Copy link
Member

afbora commented Apr 15, 2021

For example, search bora, you'll see difference between each area and all results.

https://getkirby.com/search?q=bora&area=all

@distantnative distantnative added the type: bug 🐛 Is a bug; fixes a bug label Apr 15, 2021
@afbora
Copy link
Member Author

afbora commented Apr 16, 2021

From discord, might be related:

For example, searching for "icon" or "icons" does not show the icons overview page
(https://getkirby.com/docs/reference/panel/icons)

@afbora
Copy link
Member Author

afbora commented Sep 17, 2021

@lukasbestle lukasbestle changed the title Search: search results are different Search results are not correct Oct 24, 2021
@lukasbestle
Copy link
Member

Also: #1516

@lukasbestle
Copy link
Member

Another issue of the search: The titles it displays are often not very useful, e.g. when searching for "hooks" (taken from https://kirby.nolt.io/512 by @manuelmoreale):

wvvepzaxqyvignyjcz8z

Of course it currently uses the title of the page, but maybe we can make those more specific.

@manuelmoreale
Copy link

I can add another one. Searching for a specific method, for example update() should return all the the various update() methods first IMO. Instead, currently it returns this

Screenshot 2023-02-25 at 9 39 27 AM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: bug 🐛 Is a bug; fixes a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants