You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't really think that these are appropriate formats for storing data myself, but I suspect that at least some folks who use rio may encounter XML they need to read. That format is at least used as an intentional data exchange format some times. HTML, on the other hand, is primarily useful for presentation or for scraping, where other tooling will have the ability built in.
So IMO, HTML should be removed, but we could perhaps keep some XML support. What is appropriate for XML support, I'm less sure, having, blissfully, not encountered it in the wild from static files on disk that I would use R for.
Let's talk about HTML/XML.
Can
rio::export(iris, "iris.html")
do a better job thanwriteLines(knitr::kable(iris, format = "html"), "iris.html")
? Or is it not very useful?Should we encourage exporting to some XML formats with an Open Standard schema, e.g. FODS, rather than the so-called "Shallow XML document"?
Of course, the meta-question is: Do you use these XML / HTML features? Could we deprecate them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: