Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define proper way of passing Drug type info from Reactome in BioPAX #295

Open
dustine32 opened this issue Oct 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees

Comments

@dustine32
Copy link
Collaborator

Before we were relying on a chemical having an xref to "Guide to Pharmacology" to detect whether it's a drug. Some of the enities in Reactome are type Drug but do not have this xref. It would be great to somehow export this Reactome type info into the BioPAX so we can consistently match Reactome drug status for an entity.

Ex: carbovir monophosphate [cytosol] R-ALL-2161176

Originated from #264

@dustine32 dustine32 self-assigned this Oct 13, 2023
@dustine32
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dustine32 commented Oct 13, 2023

From Guanming at Reactome:

I think we may hack by adding a new bp:comment for drugs like the following (look at the first coment):

  <bp:SmallMolecule rdf:ID="SmallMolecule15">
    <bp:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Converted from Drug in Reactome</bp:comment>
    <bp:displayName rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">xenobiotic</bp:displayName>
    <bp:name rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">carbovir monophosphate</bp:name>
    <bp:cellularLocation rdf:resource="#CellularLocationVocabulary1" />
    <bp:entityReference rdf:resource="#SmallMoleculeReference15" />
    <bp:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Reactome DB_ID: 2161176</bp:comment>
    <bp:xref rdf:resource="#UnificationXref64" />
    <bp:xref rdf:resource="#UnificationXref65" />
    <bp:dataSource rdf:resource="#Provenance1" />
    <bp:xref rdf:resource="#RelationshipXref19" />
  </bp:SmallMolecule>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant