You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the current implementation we simply drop the dayOfYear value which means the days are not corresponding after the first of march when we display leap and non-leap years. This should be normalized during the computation of non-leap year doy.
My main concern is that if we do so, the "earhengine" way of computing date (with doy + year) will be broken. So I think it should only be changed in the plotting methods and kept as it is in the GEE computation. It also need to be explained in the documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the current implementation we simply drop the dayOfYear value which means the days are not corresponding after the first of march when we display leap and non-leap years. This should be normalized during the computation of non-leap year doy.
My main concern is that if we do so, the "earhengine" way of computing date (with doy + year) will be broken. So I think it should only be changed in the plotting methods and kept as it is in the GEE computation. It also need to be explained in the documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: