You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm trying to fit an FA1 model, but sometimes I get this error:
Checking variance co-variance matrix K for linear term 1
Ok
Setting linear term 1
MSx=0.782358413511471
FA covariance matrix
df0 set to 23 for all the traits
S0 was set to:
DEH1 GAH1 GAH2 GEH1 IAH1 INH1 MIH1 MNH1 NCH1 NEH1 NEH2 NEH3 NYH2 NYH3 NYS1 SCH1 TXH1 TXH2 TXH3
7.9556863 20.2783135 173.7748939 43.4470011 56.2167504 3.7032637 6.7851079 15.6662375 5.6775808 101.9856404 8.3571794 15.3495887 47.5418310 1.9690249 51.6612751 58.9084196 0.6233221 17.9751277 19.7048923
WIH1 WIH2 WIH3
98.1848348 20.2203369 0.2596944
var was set to 100
Error in factanal(covmat = Cov$Omega, factors = Cov$nF) :
unable to optimize from this starting value
Curiously, if I try to run a couple of times, the model works, so I suppose it could be to a random initialization.
Does it make sense to increase the number of starting values or give us the option to change the lower bound?
The documentation of factanal says nstart = 1 and lower = 0.005.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To overcome this problem I did a try-catch approach to fit the model until it works:
fit_model <- function() {
mod <- Multitrait(...) # your arguments here
return(mod)
}
run <- function() {
mod <- T
while (is.list(mod) == F) {
mod <- tryCatch({fit_model()}, error = function(e) { return(TRUE) })
}
return(mod)
}
set.seed(2023)
mod <- run()
Seems overkill but it works in the first 2 or 3 tries.
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:52 PM Igor Kuivjogi Fernandes < ***@***.***> wrote:
To overcome this problem I did a try-catch approach to fit the model until
it works:
fit_model <- function() {
mod <- Multitrait(...) # your arguments here
return(mod)
}
run <- function(x) {
success <- FALSE
while (!success) {
success <- tryCatch({fit_model()}, error = function(e) { return(FALSE) })
}
return(success)
}
set.seed(2023)
mod <- run()
Seems overkill but it works in the first few tries.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#73 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC3ARLSDL5XHRTJCLN5BZQTXRGLAZANCNFSM6AAAAAA2R5A3YI>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
Hi, thanks for the BGLR package!
I'm trying to fit an FA1 model, but sometimes I get this error:
Curiously, if I try to run a couple of times, the model works, so I suppose it could be to a random initialization.
After looking for this error, I saw this post in StackOverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41146141/error-in-factor-analysis-starting-values
Does it make sense to increase the number of starting values or give us the option to change the lower bound?
The documentation of
factanal
saysnstart = 1
andlower = 0.005
.Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: