Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More detailed marked concepts indicator #612

Open
nichtich opened this issue Aug 25, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

More detailed marked concepts indicator #612

nichtich opened this issue Aug 25, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
feature:inference feature Additional functionality question Further discussion needed
Milestone

Comments

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

The green indicator of mapped concepts is useful but it should better also show some status:

  • For catalog enrichment we can only use mappings of type = or <
  • For trusted catalog enrichment we can only use mappings of type = or < by trusted user (and not downvoted) or confirmed

I'm unsure whether to hardcode the rule what to mark in which style (opinionated but better to understand) or allow configuration (flexible but complex).

@nichtich nichtich added the feature Additional functionality label Aug 25, 2021
@stefandesu stefandesu added this to the 1.6.0 milestone Nov 19, 2021
@nichtich nichtich modified the milestones: 1.6.0, 1.7.0 Dec 10, 2021
@guitarster
Copy link
Contributor

guitarster commented Nov 18, 2022

A user suggests to only show the green indicator if there is already a mapping in the concordance in which the mapping person is mapping right now.

@stefandesu
Copy link
Member

only show the green indicator if there is already a mapping in the concordance in which the mapping person is mapping right now

While I think that it should definitely be an option, I also feel like that makes it harder to understand what the indicator actually means. Although I have to admit that if this only affects the people who are mapping into a concordance, we can probably expect those people to understand it.

I'm just not sure whether it should be the default or whether there should be configurable settings on this.

@nichtich nichtich added the question Further discussion needed label May 22, 2023
@nichtich nichtich modified the milestones: 1.10.0, 1.11.0 Jun 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature:inference feature Additional functionality question Further discussion needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants