Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doubts on the use of eazy-py #18

Open
gmazzolari opened this issue Aug 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Doubts on the use of eazy-py #18

gmazzolari opened this issue Aug 26, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@gmazzolari
Copy link

  1. How does eazy-py account for non detections (upper limits)?
    If I have one source that is out of the field for one specific observed band I have to put a value of Fn<-90 (NOT_OBS_THRESHOLD), but what if the source is undetected due to the fact that the observation is 'not deep enough' to reach the emission flux?
    I have in mind how HYPERZ works. In that case I have to tell the code the limiting magnitudes associated to each observation in each filter, and then, in case of undetection in a certain band (filter), there are different possible ways through which the code can account for these upper limits. In which way does eazy-py code account for them in the z_phot computation?

  2. The prior magnitude file is applicable only if i have between my photometric points exactly the filter of the prior or is it enough having roughly the same filter band?
    That is: if I have the photometry of the K band from WIRCAM can I use the generic K prior contained in the given file 'prior_K_extend.dat'?

  3. Is there a way not to combine the templates in during the analysis?
    Putting 1 in TEMPLATE_COMBOS in the file "zphot.param.default" doesn't work, moreover whatever value i put (2,45,True,Ciao ecc..) the code works giving the same results and always linearly combining all the templates (i see different components in the final plot). I didn't find any references to the parameter TEMPLATE_COMBOS neither in the photoz.py file.

  4. Which is the origin and for which kind of objects are best suited the default templates "tweak_fsps_QSF_.." or "tweak_fsps_temp_kc13_.."?

Thank you

@irhamta
Copy link

irhamta commented Feb 3, 2023

Hi @gmazzolari, did you find a workaround to solve the TEMPLATE_COMBOS issue?

@ralphy1017
Copy link

I am having the same issue with TEMPLATE_COMBOS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants