You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a GBIF users wants to provide feedback, they usually can create a Github issue or can send an email to the curator(s). For some datasets though, the feedback button links back to the data provider's own feedback system, e.g. for iNaturalist: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/4507697725. We want to do the same for Naturgucker.
Marie from GBIF wrote:
Some other publishers (like iNaturalist) provided the link to the related pages in the occurrenceID field. That being said, I understand that the field itself doesn’t matter, the important part is that the links are provided with the occurrences. Once it is the case, you can send us an email or log a GitHub issue and we (my colleague Morten) will set up the feedback redirection.
We can't use the occurrenceID=abcd:GUID field, since Naturgucker's comments refer to a specific location, not single observations, so it is not unique. But since this is configured for each dataset, we can use another field - eventRemark = abcd:gatheringNote would be a good candidate.
We need to
Check if abcd:gatheringNote is indexed by GBIF.
If so, create a mapping for this field
email Marie or Morten to set up the feedback redirection.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The reference field is highlighted in the header.
For the feedback form those are hardcoded mappings. So what we need is a template that can be filled from the data we have available. The simplest of course is to just provide the the full url, but it could also be that you told me that you told us to use a template like https://nabu-naturgucker.de/natur.dll/{{ OCCURRENCE_ID }}
If I see it right, dwc:references is mapped to abcd:Unit/RecordURI - at least for our herbarium specimens, the RecordURI shows up as references: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/4444401887.
So we'll map that for Naturgucker... I'll contact the providers about that.
When a GBIF users wants to provide feedback, they usually can create a Github issue or can send an email to the curator(s). For some datasets though, the feedback button links back to the data provider's own feedback system, e.g. for iNaturalist: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/4507697725. We want to do the same for Naturgucker.
Marie from GBIF wrote:
We can't use the occurrenceID=abcd:GUID field, since Naturgucker's comments refer to a specific location, not single observations, so it is not unique. But since this is configured for each dataset, we can use another field - eventRemark = abcd:gatheringNote would be a good candidate.
We need to
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: