Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link GBIF Feedback function back to Naturgucker's feedback #20

Open
jholetschek opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Link GBIF Feedback function back to Naturgucker's feedback #20

jholetschek opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jholetschek
Copy link
Collaborator

jholetschek commented Jun 18, 2024

When a GBIF users wants to provide feedback, they usually can create a Github issue or can send an email to the curator(s). For some datasets though, the feedback button links back to the data provider's own feedback system, e.g. for iNaturalist: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/4507697725. We want to do the same for Naturgucker.

Marie from GBIF wrote:

Some other publishers (like iNaturalist) provided the link to the related pages in the occurrenceID field. That being said, I understand that the field itself doesn’t matter, the important part is that the links are provided with the occurrences. Once it is the case, you can send us an email or log a GitHub issue and we (my colleague Morten) will set up the feedback redirection.

We can't use the occurrenceID=abcd:GUID field, since Naturgucker's comments refer to a specific location, not single observations, so it is not unique. But since this is configured for each dataset, we can use another field - eventRemark = abcd:gatheringNote would be a good candidate.

We need to

  1. Check if abcd:gatheringNote is indexed by GBIF.
  2. If so, create a mapping for this field
  3. email Marie or Morten to set up the feedback redirection.
@jholetschek jholetschek added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 18, 2024
@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member

MortenHofft commented Jun 18, 2024

The reference field is highlighted in the header.
For the feedback form those are hardcoded mappings. So what we need is a template that can be filled from the data we have available. The simplest of course is to just provide the the full url, but it could also be that you told me that you told us to use a template like https://nabu-naturgucker.de/natur.dll/{{ OCCURRENCE_ID }}

For iNat the template is simply {{references}}

@jholetschek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

If I see it right, dwc:references is mapped to abcd:Unit/RecordURI - at least for our herbarium specimens, the RecordURI shows up as references: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/4444401887.

So we'll map that for Naturgucker... I'll contact the providers about that.

@jholetschek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Provider contacted with request to add a feedback link to the table linked to BioCASe.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants