Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide user comments (annotations) from Naturgucker to GBIF #19

Open
jholetschek opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Provide user comments (annotations) from Naturgucker to GBIF #19

jholetschek opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jholetschek
Copy link
Collaborator

Naturgucker users can provide annotations for observations. It would be nice if these could be provided to GBIF (and the LAND portal) as well.

The best way would be to concatenate the annotations of a thread and provide them in a comment field. Unfortunately, GBIF doesn't index the UnitNote field from ABCD, which would be the right place. BGBM will approach GBIF in the near future to get them to index this field (together with some other, currently unsupported fields). We have to wait until this is implemented.

@jholetschek jholetschek added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 18, 2024
@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member

Remarks and dynamicProperties are shown already. If you find that it makes sense to display it as such as an interim patch

@jholetschek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The problem is that occurrenceRemark is not indexed from its ABCD equivalent abcd:Unit/Notes, so that would have to be added first.

What exactly do you mean by dynamicProperties? The MeasurementOrFact extension? Unfortunately, that's also not indexed by GBIF (yet).

@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member

MortenHofft commented Jun 18, 2024

I mean this field https://dwc.tdwg.org/terms/#dwc:dynamicProperties as seen on e.g. https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2238133420

I do not know anything about abcd mappings so perhaps I'm just causing confusion. It was just to two fields that came to mind

@jholetschek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I wasn't aware of that field - but I'm afraid there is no equivalent in ABCD.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants