-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Missing support for GBIF triplet style ID #59
Comments
Supposedly the above dataset cannot be indexed at GBIF because 29 out of 8015 records have duplicate triplets (see below - thanks @jlegind for doing the analysis). If this is true, the validator should explain this precisely and clearly - currently the user isn't warned of these duplicates. institutionCode collectionCode catalogNumber Count |
Triplet are not supported by purpose and all new datasets shall use a single identifier field (e.g. occurrenceId). |
ah ok I see, the validation result includes nothing except empty |
Transferred from gbif/portal-feedback#588
Missing support for GBIF triplet style ID
This dataset from Togo uses the GBIF triplet style identifier, which is a combination of three fields: catalogNumber, institutionCode and collectionCode.
Each of its records is therefore uniquely identified.
Contrary to the validator report, the file should be indexible by GBIF and each record should be uniquely identified.
Of course we want to promote the use of occurrenceIDs instead of the GBIF triplet, however, the validator is supposed to reflect GBIF indexing operating procedures, which supports the GBIF triplet identifier afaik.
fbitem-9ceba7755c086fa5a18ef4c6bd2102ecccab59e7
User provided contact info: kbraak
System: Chrome 61.0.3163 / Mac OS X 10.10.5
Referer: https://www.gbif.org/tools/data-validator/1508848348041
Window size: width 1338 - height 843
API log
Site log
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: