Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Object versioning #74

Open
gaul opened this issue Jul 24, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Object versioning #74

gaul opened this issue Jul 24, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@gaul
Copy link
Owner

gaul commented Jul 24, 2015

S3Proxy does not currently support object versioning, triggering many s3-tests failures:

ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_bucket_create_suspend
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_obj_create_read_remove
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_obj_create_read_remove_head
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_obj_suspend_versions
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_obj_suspend_versions_simple
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_obj_create_versions_remove_all
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_obj_create_overwrite_multipart
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_obj_list_marker
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_copy_obj_version
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_multi_object_delete
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_multi_object_delete_with_marker
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioning_multi_object_delete_with_marker_create
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioned_object_acl
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioned_concurrent_object_create_concurrent_remove
ERROR: s3tests.functional.test_s3.test_versioned_concurrent_object_create_and_remove

Implementing this requires upstream jclouds work tracked by JCLOUDS-895.

@jeffcollaboro
Copy link

Hi Andrew, just bumping this. I see you have done quite a bit of work in the JCLouds upstream but it seems to have lost momentum over a few years of being blocked by issues. Wondering your thoughts on dusting this off.

@gaul
Copy link
Owner Author

gaul commented Apr 13, 2024

This is a large task and I have no plans to work on this. I don't think jclouds is a good base for the future, instead S3Proxy should use vendor SDKs as suggested in #606 which implements the jclouds BlobStore interface. Then S3Proxy can create and implement an ExtendedBlobStore interface that calls into the versioned APIs when available. Versioning specifically creates some issues since we need the version number in the object metadata.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants