Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Change control_execution service interface into an action based one #44

Open
Oberacda opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Change control_execution service interface into an action based one #44

Oberacda opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@mdeitersen
Labels
Core Library Issues concerning the core BT library. enhancement New feature or request GUI Issues with the ros_bt_py Web GUI High Priority question Further information is requested
Milestone
v0.2.x

Comments

@Oberacda
Copy link
Contributor

Feature Request

Description

This will allow the reporting of feedback on which nodes are getting setup/ticked at the moment and will allow a user to abort setup/execution that takes too long.
The service interface should still be available after the conversion, using the new actions "under the hood," allowing the new behaviour to be tested with the current assumptions
@Oberacda Oberacda added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested GUI Issues with the ros_bt_py Web GUI Core Library Issues concerning the core BT library. High Priority labels Dec 18, 2023
@mdeitersen
Copy link
Contributor

mdeitersen commented May 31, 2024 •
edited
Loading

working on it @Oberacda

@Oberacda Oberacda added this to the v0.2.x milestone Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mdeitersen mdeitersen

Labels
Core Library Issues concerning the core BT library. enhancement New feature or request GUI Issues with the ros_bt_py Web GUI High Priority question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.2.x
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Oberacda @mdeitersen