We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I wonder if the ShellCommand and RawCommand runners are safe.
ShellCommand
RawCommand
Please provide the steps required to reproduce the problem
visit documentation at https://fake.build/apidocs/v5/fake-core-command.html
Wonder, whatever or not, both APIs provide a sanitized interface.
ShellCommand (which is probably unsafe) being described as vulnerable to malicious user code.
RawCommand (which is probably safe) being described as sanitized.
No mention of security at all.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Description
I wonder if the
ShellCommand
andRawCommand
runners are safe.Repro steps
Please provide the steps required to reproduce the problem
visit documentation at https://fake.build/apidocs/v5/fake-core-command.html
Wonder, whatever or not, both APIs provide a sanitized interface.
Expected behavior
ShellCommand (which is probably unsafe) being described as vulnerable to malicious user code.
RawCommand (which is probably safe) being described as sanitized.
Actual behavior
No mention of security at all.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: