You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wanted to ask a possibly naive question. Firstly, thank you in advance for your help I couldn't get much off of the web for this question.
As per the Issue's title suggests, I was wondering why when running the GWAS analysis using GEMMA, there are fewer variants analysed than that present in the input VCF. Specifically, the log states that there are only ~2 million variants analysed, whilst I know that the input VCF has ~33 million SNPs. There are no filtering options selected other than the vcf2gwas's option of --minaf 0.05. Attached is a relevant log. Hope this question makes sense, and thank you once again!
Hi,
I wanted to ask a possibly naive question. Firstly, thank you in advance for your help I couldn't get much off of the web for this question.
As per the Issue's title suggests, I was wondering why when running the GWAS analysis using GEMMA, there are fewer variants analysed than that present in the input VCF. Specifically, the log states that there are only ~2 million variants analysed, whilst I know that the input VCF has ~33 million SNPs. There are no filtering options selected other than the vcf2gwas's option of --minaf 0.05. Attached is a relevant log. Hope this question makes sense, and thank you once again!
vcf2gwas_Mq_hwe_cat.beagle_GWAS_phenotype_height_COItransformedfoursqrt_20231023_054900.log.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: