You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When #292 was posted, upgrading OpenSSL was included as an optional item. At the time, v1.0 was expected to be reached before the EOL date of OpenSSL 1.1.1.
Since then, OpenSSL 1.1.1 has gone out of support, making this a lot more urgent. IMO it now warrants more than an optional status for v1.0.
Unfortunately OpenSSL 3.0 reportedly has severe performance regressions compared to 1.1.1. These are fixed in later (non-LTS) OpenSSL releases; in particular, the latest 3.3 release, while not an LTS, has a support period ending only a few months before that of 3.0. Of course, newer versions introduce increased risk of failing to build with the gcc 4.0.4-based toolchain available when we build OpenSSL.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When #292 was posted, upgrading OpenSSL was included as an optional item. At the time, v1.0 was expected to be reached before the EOL date of OpenSSL 1.1.1.
Since then, OpenSSL 1.1.1 has gone out of support, making this a lot more urgent. IMO it now warrants more than an optional status for v1.0.
Unfortunately OpenSSL 3.0 reportedly has severe performance regressions compared to 1.1.1. These are fixed in later (non-LTS) OpenSSL releases; in particular, the latest 3.3 release, while not an LTS, has a support period ending only a few months before that of 3.0. Of course, newer versions introduce increased risk of failing to build with the gcc 4.0.4-based toolchain available when we build OpenSSL.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: