Replies: 2 comments
-
In my opinion, using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Here's the patch: #662. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, all. I'd like to suggest a few minor style changes, and if you'll approve them, I'll send patches.
My proposal: rename
VOID
back intovoid
.If you'll look at
form3.h
, half of the function declarations are alreadyvoid
, and as a general rule, I would like to see more standard types being used when possible.void
is certainly a standard type that does not need a typedef.Approve or disapprove?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions