Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIQM-564: Hide permission 'quickMARC: Create a new MARC authority record' #600

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2023

Conversation

Dmytro-Melnyshyn
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

Hide permission quickMARC: Create a new MARC authority record

Approach

TODOS and Open Questions

Issue

UIQM-564

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 27, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±0    40 suites  ±0   2m 4s ⏱️ -19s
337 tests ±0  337 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
338 runs  ±0  338 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit a3a2437. ± Comparison against base commit 8eeec5b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

warning The version of Java (11.0.17) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17.
Read more here

@Dmytro-Melnyshyn Dmytro-Melnyshyn merged commit a731751 into master Sep 27, 2023
4 checks passed
@Dmytro-Melnyshyn Dmytro-Melnyshyn deleted the UIQM-564 branch September 27, 2023 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants