Abort Fil+ program by removing restriction to access to multiplier and allowing unrestricted minting of datacap? #1082
brian75235
started this conversation in
Polls
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
至从fil+出现后,sp陆续离开。这是傻逼决策,看似去中心化,实际上还是fil开发团队说了算。fil+的出现币价一直跌,完全起不来,什么降低sp加入的成本,结果呢?币价低,成本低,sp数量新增了吗?一个连sp都看不到希望的项目,指望散户看懂?为何btc的机器贵的同时全球各地还在增加节点?fil是反其道而行之,节点在不停的到期退出。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
他们只想赚钱,你却想让FIL变得更好。闹呢 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Yeah. You're right. This is a stupid system that should have been shut down. No matter what consequences we face, I voted yes! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The Fil+ program is a pain in the neck for all SPs. And it is highly centralized, awfully inefficient, and not really achieving its aim.
With above, I would like to re-mention this FIP: #844, by starting this poll.
Fil+ 项目对所有 SP(存储提供商)来说都是个大麻烦。它高度集中、效率极其低下,并且并未真正实现其目标。
高度集中化:基本上,Galen 和 Kevin 决定谁能获得 DC(数据容量)以及获得多少,但没有明确的指导方针和规则来支持这些决策,这使得这些决策可能带有很强的主观性。(我不是说他们的决策一定是错的,而是决策机制本身不合理。)相比 1-2 年前所谓的分配路径(allocator pathways)出现之前,现在的情况甚至更糟。
效率极低:审核和分配 DC 需要花费非常长的时间。那些积极封装数据的 SP 需要花费大量时间等待和处理 DC 分配问题。他们几乎完全依赖 SPARK 系统作为数据来源,而这个系统本身就存在很多缺陷,已经受到许多客户和 SP 的抱怨。(虽然 SPARK 是一个有用的工具,但任何工具都有其缺陷。)而 Fil+ 团队却声称他们太忙了,无法开发新工具或改进现有工具。这一点我完全无法理解。
未能真正实现其目标:实际上,即使经过这么多麻烦,仍然有 99.9% 的上链数据是垃圾数据,那又何必费劲?这就像花费大量时间和精力去装饰一坨屎。
基于以上几点,我想再次提及这个 FIP:https://github.com/filecoin-project/FIPs/discussions/844,并发起这项投票。
27 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions