2nd Community Review of Bitengine-Reeta Allocator

[Bitengine-reeta]

Latest report:https://compliance.allocator.tech/report/f03014781/1730765561/report.md

Currently, a total of 5 clients have applied to us, of which 1 is a public dataset and 4 are enterprise datasets (2 have been approved and the other 2 are still under communication).

The average Spark search success rate is 47%, which is a medium level. The main reason is that some customers use the DDO model. In the future, we plan to reduce or stop cooperation with customers who use the DDO order model. For customers with low Spark search rates, our technical team is also helping customers improve the Spark search success rate. We look forward to our continued improvement in the future.

[filecoin-watchdog]

@Bitengine-reeta
Allocator Application
Compliance Report
1st Review
1st Review score: 5PiB

5 PiB granted to existing clients:

Client Name	DC	status
NOAA	2PiB	Existing
BeijingMipai Culture Media	2PiB	Existing
JuQing Media	0.5PiB	New
sxqiaonao	0.2PiB	New

NOAA

• SPs list updated in this round:
  f03055005 HK Chris
  f01315096 HK Chris
  f03091739 USA Lanxin
  f03156617 Australia Tongkun
  f03148356 Japan Linyun
  f01106668 HK Chris
  f03144037 South Korea Cary
  f0870558 HK Chris
  f03151456 HTY Shenzhen
  f03055018 Chris HK
  f01889668 Mike US
  f03151449 HTY Shenzhen
  f01518369 Mike US
  f03179570 YunSD Singapore
  f03055029 Chris HK
  f03188440 Fei Vancouver, Canada
  f03190614 Laibin Dubai
  f03190616 YM Japan
  f03066836 、
  f03081958

• SPs list used for deals:
  f03055005
  f0870558
  f01315096
  f01106668
  f03055029
  f03055018
  f03091739
  f03091738
  f03074589
  f03074586
  f03074587
  f03074583
  f02199999
  f03156617
  f03148356
  f03144037
  f01518369
  f01889668

• 6SPs don’t match provided list

• 8 out of 18 SPs have retrieval rate of 0%.

BeijingMipai Culture Media

• In this round, the client updated 22 SPs (top 10 match the previous allocation). Most SPs out of the following list were used for deals (except f03151456 and f0317957):
  f01106668 Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
  f0870558 Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
  f03091739 Dallas, Texas, US
  f03091738 Dallas, Texas, US
  f03074589 Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
  f03074587 Seoul, Seoul, KR
  f02199999 Singapore, Singapore, SG
  f03144037 Paripark, Seoul, KR
  f03156617 Sydney, New South Wales, AU
  f03148356 Ōi, Saitama, JP
  f01518369 US
  f01889668 US
  f03055018 Hong Kong
  f03055029 Hong Kong
  f02013352 Hong Kong
  f03151449 CN,Shenzhen HTY
  f03151456 CN,Shenzhen HTY
  f0317957 Singapore, Singapore YunSD
  f03178077 JP,Tokyo Gong
  f03178144 JP,Tokyo Gong
  f03179572 US Flycloud
  f03214937 US Flycloud

• 20 new SPs were used to make deals(total 30). List of added SPs:
  f03179570
  f03178077
  f03179572
  f03178144
  f03214937
  f03229933
  f03229932
  f03055029
  f03055018
  f03055005
  f01315096
  f03151449
  f03188440
  f03173127
  f02013352
  f01928097
  f03190614
  f03190616
  f01518369
  f01889668

• 10 newly added SPs don’t match updated list.

• 10 SPs have retrieval rate of 0%, 8 SPs have retrieval of >75%, and the rest have retrieval below the acceptable level.

• The client declared 6 replicas, while there are already 9.

JuQing Media

• The client said they applied for DC in behalf of their clients. Could that be explained more?
• The client said:

“Initial storage will be on Filecoin. Future data storage plans: We will be launching in the next two weeks.”

What does it mean? Initial storage on filecoin and what after that?

• Why did the allocator grant 500TiB in the first allocation? What's the allocation schedule here?
• the client sealed around 20% of DC so far, and the report shows all of data was sealed with one SP and retrieval rate of it is at 34%

sxqiaonao

• SPs list provided in the form:
  SP ID:f03091738 Location:US
  SP ID:f02199999 Location:Singapore
  SP ID:f03074583 Location:Japan
  SP ID:f03000070 Location:China
• This data was already stored on the filecoin: [DataCap Application] Qiaonao Enterprise Management - Course Data filecoin-plus-large-datasets#975 What is the reason for store it again?
• KYC was not completed from my perspective. The client said someone else has passes it previously. That’s not the best explanation.
• the client sealed around 25% of DC so far, and the report shows all of data was sealed with one SP and retrieval rate of it is at 18%
• the only SP used for the deals doesn’t match the provided SPs list (f03179572).
• Why did the allocator grant 200TiB in the first allocation? What's the allocation schedule here?