Quality controle on "Organisations using Fastify"

[Uzlopak]

Prerequisites

• I have written a descriptive issue title
• I have searched existing issues to ensure the issue has not already been raised

Issue

I find it critical, that we accept every logo and organization without due dilligence.

[mcollina]

I think so too, we should really make this stricter.

@Eomm @jsumners wdyt?

Should we remove it completely?

[Eomm]

Let's keep the sponsors only

[jsumners]

The only framework I can find that even lists any users is Hapi. And they only list them with testimonials on https://hapi.dev.

I think the logos are good to show that people are using the framework, but agree there might need to be some more judicious addition of them.

I would be more in favor of removing them completely than only listing the logos of sponsors. We never advertised that we would promote the logos of sponsors, and I think it would be too preferential to drop all of the others and not those.

To summarize, my preferences would be:

1. Drop them all.
2. Incorporate a few "big name" logos with testimonials.

[Eomm]

Drop them all.

This clashes a bit with our Tiers: https://opencollective.com/fastify
This use case is not covered by our policy 😭

[Uzlopak]

Tbh i wanted to report this issue for months now and was not sure how you would take it. I have two worries:

1. We potentially use the logos of companies who dont use fastify and maybe worse: never agreed to use their logo on our page.
2. We potentially make advertisement for some shady websites, for free.

Free Use and royalty free is some concept of USA, which is not feasible in EU.
And for Nr. 2 we never verify the claim and maybe tomorrow some adult entertainment or gambling or crypto wants to be advertised. I fear crypto is already part of our list.

[jsumners]

Drop them all.

This clashes a bit with our Tiers: https://opencollective.com/fastify

This use case is not covered by our policy 😭

Ugh. I forgot that exists. But it doesn't change my opinion.

[jsumners]

Tbh i wanted to report this issue for months now and was not sure how you would take it. I have two worries:

1. We potentially use the logos of companies who dont use fastify and maybe worse: never agreed to use their logo on our page.

2. We potentially make advertisement for some shady websites, for free.

Free Use and royalty free is some concept of USA, which is not feasible in EU.

And for Nr. 2 we never verify the claim and maybe tomorrow some adult entertainment or gambling or crypto wants to be advertised. I fear crypto is already part of our list.

I'm not really following this.

[Eomm]

@fastify/collaborators Please share your vote here: https://github.com/orgs/fastify/discussions/48

[Eomm]

Superseded by #255