-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
Platform support for fabric8-launcher/launcher-application on PowerPC64LE #994
Comments
@sarveshtamba hi! Thank you for looking into this. Unfortunately we don't have access to a We also currently have no plans to support |
Hi @gastaldi The build system seems to be fetching & installing it's own version of node package and not using the one I built locally which is causing the issue:-
Any way I can force the build system to use the node version that I have built locally? |
Looking at https://github.com/eirslett/frontend-maven-plugin#frontend-maven-plugin I don't think that's possible, since it always attempt to download it first. Perhaps instead of installing |
Hi @gastaldi , using node v12.11.0 as below worked fine and I was able to complete the maven build:
|
Excellent! Want to provide a PR with this change? |
@gastaldi sure, will raise a PR for this soon. |
Closed in 1f1d6db |
I have been able to successfully deploy fabric8-launcher/launcher-operator on PowerPC64LE as mentioned in "Route Laucher not found on PPC64LE launcher-operator#50 (comment)"
Currently working on step to "Install the Launcher (via the installed operator)". Facing issues with the example launcher yaml which makes use of image:
fabric8/launcher-backend:latest
, which for now is available only for x86_64.I was facing the below failures on ppc64le while building fabric8/launcher-backend:
https://github.com/SpectoLabs/hoverfly
and then tried to use this locally built hoverfly installation in the fabric8/launcher-backend build. However I was not successful in that, so by-passed the test cases which made use of hoverfly(by deleting temporarily):-Any help towards this would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: