Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Just tested my integration and mine is still working. Thanks for the push to implement this sooner rather than later though, this is very concerning. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi MarcW4, I can confirm that the enforcement date for the header updates has not been moved up. The deadline remains January 18, 2026, as stated in the announcement email. While a 400 status code can indicate formatting issues, it is often thrown when there is an issue with the specific header configuration or the status of the API Key itself. I recommend double-checking the current status of your applications in the developer portal to ensure the key you are using is active: https://www.etsy.com/developers/your-apps If the status looks correct and you are still experiencing issues, please send your App ID and specific details about the failed request to developer@etsy.com so we can look into it further. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I received a notice from Etsy on 5 Dec 25 entitled "ACTION REQUIRED: Update your Etsy OpenAPI authentication headers by January 18, 2026". Not wanting to interrupt daily operations, I chose to defer implementation to the last week of December when we would not be publishing new or updated listings - well before the stated deadline.
Yesterday (17 Dec 25), my program failed. The only clue was the 400 status code and location in the source code where it was recognized and captured. I consulted ChatGPT which, in an authoritative tone, informed me that Etsy required the new x-api-key values - a month in advance of the deadline. I applied the updated value and the application resumed running, proving the deadline was not truthful.
My publication routines are on auto-pilot. Every hour, they look for the presence of data files to process. Had I not examined the runtime logs it generates, I would have been unaware there was a problem.
That announcement was a warning and a promise. Implementing the changed requirements one month in advance of the promised deadline was wrong and disruptive. Has anyone else experienced the same?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions