You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm trying to use the hand-eye calibration to calculate the transformation between two trajectories. These two trajectories are pure rotation, that is, the translation part are all zeros.
When I run "compute_hand_eye_calibration.py", the calibration FAILED. Then I modified the "all-zero" translation with non-zero value, this still occur, but just sometimes.
While debugging, I learnt that the dual-quaternion based calibration algorithm you implemented has a precondition as " assert a != 0.0, "This would involve division by zero." " When I set "all translations = zero", the value "a" exactly equals 0. When I set "all translations = a non-zero value", the value "a" sometimes becomes very small (e.g., 1.0e-15). This seems to be the reason of the failure.
I found a temporary solution as
but I am not sure whether this is a right way. Or, maybe this " calibration FAILED" is just because of my improper understanding. I will appreciate any of your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I'm trying to use the hand-eye calibration to calculate the transformation between two trajectories. These two trajectories are pure rotation, that is, the translation part are all zeros.
When I run "compute_hand_eye_calibration.py", the calibration FAILED. Then I modified the "all-zero" translation with non-zero value, this still occur, but just sometimes.
While debugging, I learnt that the dual-quaternion based calibration algorithm you implemented has a precondition as " assert a != 0.0, "This would involve division by zero." " When I set "all translations = zero", the value "a" exactly equals 0. When I set "all translations = a non-zero value", the value "a" sometimes becomes very small (e.g., 1.0e-15). This seems to be the reason of the failure.
I found a temporary solution as
but I am not sure whether this is a right way. Or, maybe this " calibration FAILED" is just because of my improper understanding. I will appreciate any of your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: